|
There's been an awful lot of nonsense written about the
penalty gaffe in Saturday's win over Man City. Here's some more. It'll turn into a
bit of a ramble I suspect because I have mixed feelings about it,
but this is an incident that'll be talked about in the future and
so it's only right that our news archive covers it.
"Disrespectful", some say. Well, perhaps in a sense. Perhaps
the players wouldn't have done it if we'd been playing Chelsea
or Man Utd, who knows? But personally I like to see a bit of
lack of respect for the opponent now and then. When things are
going swimmingly it underlines Arsenal's superiority and
provides a bit of extra entertainment. "Same old Arsenal,
taking the piss", we sing in the Clock End at these times,
and we revel in it. You can't have it both ways: if you want
the players to try the outrageous from time to time then you
have to accept that from time to time it won't work.
Of course, the difference between, say, a gratuitous nutmeg
(or even a nutmegged
backheeled goal) and a screwed-up penalty
is that the latter squanders what should be a certain goal (not
that penalties have been certain goals for us of late). So I'm
hoping that we won't try it again unless the win is secure, but
I'm hoping that we will try it again.
Johann Cruyff, famous for scoring in the way Bobby and
Thierry attempted, makes an interesting point about "disrespect". In applauding
the attempt as innovative (especially after the media had been
criticising the Premiership for becoming boring) he
says that,
"It is disrespectful at 6-0 or 7-0 but to do it at 1-0, it is just another way to take a penalty."
Stuart Pearce seems to agree, and rather than calling it disrespectful he's
simply called it a "legitimate ploy" and "new and innovative". Rather than
criticise Arsenal he chooses to applaud his defenders, 2 of whom followed Henry in
to defend the move, which may well have had a key role in making the ref mistakenly think
that Pires had touched the ball twice and hence blowing for a City free-kick
rather than a penalty re-take (apparently the ball only has to move forward
to be in play, rather than by a full circumference, but as far as I'm concerned
it didn't even do that). Fair play to Pearce, it's reassuring to see
that he's not been infected by the attitude of some of his whiney players... especially the French pair Distin & Sommeil
who amongst their moaning claimed that "During an important match, they would not have done it",
raising the question of what exactly they thought was "unimportant" about this match (sounds like a lack of self-respect to me!)
So anyway I'm pleased to hear that Thierry Henry has
said that
he does plan to try it again, "...but next time I will push the ball off the penalty
spot for someone else. The main problem will be finding someone to do it with me - especially
after Saturday." Good point. According to the Mirror (although apparently contradicted
by Pires), it was mainly Dennis Bergkamp
that had been practising the move with Thierry in training, and he refused to co-operate
at only 1-0 up against an in-form City side. Having said that, if Henry's taking the
penalty then to a certain extent it's up to him, and if he tells a team-mate that he's
going to pass the penalty to them and they then don't make the run, he'll be
right to pass the buck to them.
Henry has revealed that he's been wanting to try something unusual from a
penalty for years, but "I have never found anyone who
had the guts to do it with me", he says, before cheekily contradicting himself with a
poke at Pires, "It is nothing to do with being brave, it's about getting it right".
Like Henry, Robert Pires has apologised for Saturday (to Arsene Wenger and the fans for missing it, mind, not to Man City for trying it). Bobby says he "had moment of total panic.
My mind went blank" (prompting The Sun's puntastic
"I pen-icked" headline). Cruyff suggested that the mistake Arsenal made was in
getting Pires to take... "The guy who comes up with the idea must be the one who
takes the risk of making the pass", which makes sense given the "flood of doubts" that
affected Bobby at the crucial moment.
Pires was happy to do a bit
of buck-passing himself when he made it clear that it was all Henry's idea
(anyone else notice the little chat Henry had with Pires immediately before the latter took
the first penalty on Saturday? I can't help wondering if they/he were even considering it
at nil-nil!). And Henry was happy to accept that responsibility (for the idea
if not the mis-execution). In the light of this some Arsenal fans were outraged by
Henry's then giggling when talking about the incident in post-match interviews.
I say, hold the outrage. Surely to see the funny side of things that
have a funny side is only human. Of course they see the serious side as well but
don't we want them to enjoy playing for Arsenal... especially the man who's taken
over from Ian Wright (if anyone has ever played the game with more infectious
enthusiasm then I've not seen him, although Henry comes as close as anyone). Yes, it could have cost us points, but if it had then I think it's fair to assume that Henry would not have been giggling abou tit afterwards, don't you?
Bobby spoke to
CanalPlus about it on Sunday and also emphasized this aspect, "We put some humour into
soccer, it's not that bad."
Fair play to Jose Mourinho, by the way, for adding his own bit of humour to the
inquest: "You know why they took the penalty like that? They have so many penalties
in a season, they had to do something different." Total rubbish, and he knows it, but that's
not the point.
At the end of the day, Arsenal provided a talking (laughing) point for
everyone in what was otherwise a pretty drab game. So we missed a penalty. We've missed penalties before. They
are not, in fact, 100% guaranteed goals. Was Bobby's error really that much worse than
taking a conventional penalty that misses the goal altogether? I can't see it.
At the end of the day, we won the game. As Bobby says, "...it makes us laugh now. Especially because we won". Any Gooners s still fuming about the incident (and believe me, from my email I know there are those whose heads are still in danger of immiment explosion), please let yourselves have a little giggle. You'll feel better, I promise.
Even if Henry never tries it again, let's be glad that he says he will. Because if
nothing else, it'll give opposition goalkeepers something extra to think about
when they see Henry put the ball on the spot.
Thierry says he won't try it if we're
awarded a penalty against Tottenham at the weekend but, Paul Robinson, can you be sure?
|